This page has two jobs. First, it explains everything printed on the pouch we sell: the three named lines on the panel, the ten other ingredients that turn them into a chew, what each one is, and what the research does and does not say about it, including who was in each study, at what amount, and what each study actually measured. Second, and this is the part most advertising pages leave out, it lists the headlines we run, tells you which ones are exaggerated, and separates the small number of things that are genuinely supported by evidence from the many that are not.
You almost certainly arrived here from an advertisement. The headline you clicked was written by us and paid for by us to appear next to real news stories. It was designed to make you stop scrolling. Several of our headlines overstate what science actually shows, and a few attribute statements to experts who do not exist.
Everything on this site is a paid advertisement for a product we sell. If you buy through a link on any of our pages, we are paid a commission. That is the reason this site exists.
The product is a resealable pouch of thirty soft chews made for HumanN (Human Power of N) of Austin, Texas and sold by GNC Holdings, LLC of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as a dietary supplement. One chew is a serving: a blueberry-pomegranate flavored square carrying beet root powder 300 mg, a grape-derived resveratrol 150 mg and coffee fruit extract 100 mg, with 20 calories and two grams of added sugar. It is not a medicine, it is not meant for any medical condition, and no study has ever tested these three ingredients together in anyone. The words "Memory + Focus" on the front of the bag are a product name chosen by the maker, not a finding, and the panel carries the standard statement that its claims have not been evaluated by the FDA. No food, drink or supplement on this page is a substitute for your own clinician.
The front of the pouch also prints the words "Blueberry Pomegranate Flavor" and "Decaffeinated". Neither blueberry nor pomegranate appears among the three named lines on the panel: they are the flavoring. Our article says so, and we say it again here.
If you are genuinely worried about your memory, the single most useful thing you can do is book an appointment with your own clinician. That costs you nothing from us, and a proper conversation about your nights, your hearing, what you take daily and your habits is worth more than anything we are selling. We would rather you close this page and make that call than buy something under a false impression.
These are the headlines we have run, grouped by the claim they make. The right-hand column is our own plain assessment. We have marked each family of headlines as Exaggerated, Partly true, Withdrawn, Our headline was wrong or Broadly supported.
| The headline as you saw it | What is actually behind it |
|---|---|
| "One Pouch of Beet Chews, Balanced Line by Line in a Saturday Ledger" | Broadly supported This headline describes what our article does: it sets what one pouch costs against what each of the three named lines on the panel has behind it, and every figure checks out. On the cost side, the seller's list price was $39.99 for thirty chews when we read it, about $1.33 a chew, with a flat shipping charge on a single pouch, two grams of added sugar and 20 calories a chew. On the other side, the coffee fruit line (100 mg) rests on a single dose followed by two hours of blood sampling in ten people per group, [1] the beet line (300 mg of powder) on a single day of nitrate-rich eating that included beet juice, measured on a scan, [2] and the resveratrol line (150 mg) on a study that gave 200 mg a day for twenty-six weeks to 46 healthy overweight adults aged 50 to 75. [3] "Balanced" does not mean the product works, and we are not implying that it does. The article's own conclusion is that the two columns do not balance on paper: only one study measured memory, it used more resveratrol than the chew holds, the chew itself has never been tested, and one pouch covers about a sixth of that study's twenty-six weeks. See section 6. |
| "Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Spell These 3 Words. Test Now""Top Doctors Say Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Pronounce These 3 Phrases. Can You?""Memory Decline Begins When Seniors Say These 3 Phrases (See The List)""Declining Memory Begins When Seniors Say These 7 Phrases. See Which Ones" | Exaggerated There is no set of three words, three phrases or seven phrases whose spelling or pronunciation marks the beginning of anything. Nothing "begins" at a word. Word tasks do appear inside the short memory checks clinicians use, but those checks are given in person and read alongside your history, what you take daily and your age. Failing a word online means nothing on its own: plenty of people stumble over a word when they are tired, nervous or being timed. "Top doctors" refers to no specific person. See section 4. |
| "Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Greatest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Exaggerated No group of Japanese doctors issued this statement. There is no such panel, no such list, and no source we can point you to. Japan appears in the headline because it is widely associated with long life, which makes the claim feel credible. That is a marketing decision, not a citation. The second half is also wrong. Memory changes with age for everyone, and no diet removes that. What is true is narrower: certain long-term drinking and eating patterns travel with faster slippage on thinking tests in large population studies. [4] [5] Association is not proof of cause, and "just avoid these three" is not how any of it works. |
| "Nobel Prize's Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Withdrawn We retract this one outright. No Nobel laureate has endorsed this page, this product, or any list of three foods on our behalf. Attaching the Nobel Prize to an advertisement implies an authority that does not exist and we should not have run it. |
| "The Overlooked Boxed Cereal Now Tied to 8 Out of 10 Memory Cases" | Our headline was wrong There is no such statistic. No study ties any cereal to eight out of ten cases of anything, "memory cases" is not a category any researcher uses, and no cereal has been "overlooked" by anyone: the sugar figure is printed on the side of every box. The number was invented for the headline and we withdraw it. The grain of truth is the one below: a diet heavy in ultra-processed food, the sweet cereal shelf included, travels in a large Brazilian study with somewhat faster slippage on thinking tests over eight years. [5] That is a modest association across thousands of people, not eight in ten of anyone. See section 3. |
| "Brain Experts Now Say These 3 Cereals Age the Brain Faster Than Time""Scientists Now Say This 1 Cereal Ages the Brain Faster Than Time" | Exaggerated No food ages the brain "faster than time." That phrase was written for effect and it is not a finding from any study. It is also internally inconsistent: in one version it is three cereals, in another it is one, because the number is something we test for click-through, not something anyone measured. The grain of truth: diets high in ultra-processed food are associated with somewhat faster slippage on thinking tests over years. [5] See section 3. |
| "Doctors Now Say This Popular Evening Drink Is Behind Memory Loss" | Partly true The "evening drink" is alcohol, and of everything our ads point at, this is where the evidence is strongest. In British civil servants followed for thirty years, higher drinking went with shrinkage of the hippocampus, the region most involved in forming memories, and with faster decline in word fluency; light drinkers had no edge over non-drinkers. [4] What is overstated is the word "behind." Alcohol is one contributing factor among many, not the cause of memory slips. It is also worth saying plainly: the chew we sell contains no alcohol, and the front of its pouch prints the word "Decaffeinated". |
| "Doctors Name 5 Popular Drinks Now Tied To Memory Decline. Coffee Tops The List""Seniors: These 4 Drinks May Be Aging Your Brain Faster""Neurologists Say Cognitive Decline Isn't Age: Just Stop Drinking These 2 Popular Drinks" | Exaggerated Notice that the count changes: two drinks, three, four, five. It changes because it is an advertising variable we rotate, not a number that came out of a study. No neurologist is named in any version, because none was consulted. "Coffee tops the list" is the clearest thing we have got wrong: none of the studies on this page is about plain coffee. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, two to three 12-ounce cups of brewed coffee, as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults. [6] There is a second reason this matters here. One of the three named lines in the product we sell is an extract of the fruit that grows around the coffee bean, and the maker prints "Decaffeinated" on the front of the pouch. See section 2 and section 6. |
| "Memory Slipping? Check These 4 Everyday Drinks First" | Partly true Half right, in the wrong order. If your memory is slipping, the first thing to check is not a drink; it is a conversation with your own clinician about your nights, your hearing and what you take daily. The four drinks are the everyday ones in section 2. Not enough plain water belongs on the list too, and of everything in our advertising that is the item with the least glamour and the most support. [7] [8] |
| "Still Sharp at 90? Seniors Are Rethinking These 3 Everyday Foods" | Partly true The gentlest of our headlines, and still an overstatement. Nobody knows what keeps a particular person sharp at 90, and no single food does it. The three everyday foods are sugary breakfast cereals, processed meats and packaged baked goods, all in section 3. Eating less of them is part of the long, slow habits in section 5, and no food is a promise at any age. |
| "One chew a day, three ingredients, and the only one with a memory study behind it" | Partly true The chew and the three ingredients are accurate: the label says one chew daily and the panel prints three named lines. The last clause is true and needs its detail. Of the three, only the grape-derived resveratrol has a study that put a word list in front of people: 200 milligrams a day for 26 weeks in 46 healthy overweight adults aged 50 to 75, who held on to more words after a 30-minute delay and showed higher hippocampal connectivity on a scan. [3] The panel prints 150 milligrams, three quarters of that amount, and every participant in that study was overweight. The beet line rests on a single day of nitrate-rich eating with juice in older adults averaging about 75, which moved regional blood flow on a scan and measured no memory at all, [2] and the coffee fruit line rests on a single dose in ten people per group that raised a blood protein over two hours. [1] See section 6. |
| "Neurologists Name 5 Popular Prescriptions Now Tied to Memory Decline" | Partly true, and the one not to act on alone No neurologist named a list for us, and we will not print one. What is true is that pharmacists keep lists of everyday products, some sold over the counter, that are often a poor fit after 65, and that a yearly look at everything you take is worth having. But an advertisement is the worst possible reason to change anything a clinician gave you: never stop or change it because of something you read in an ad, including ours. Put everything you take in one bag, this pouch included, and ask your pharmacist. See the box at the end of section 2. |
An honest answer: these headlines appear beside real news stories, competing for attention with everything else on the page, and dramatic phrasing gets clicked. That is the incentive, and we are subject to it like every other advertiser.
It is also why this page exists. Once you are here, you are entitled to know exactly which claims we can stand behind and which ones were written to get your attention. Everything below is the sober version.
Our headlines have referred, in different versions, to "3 beverages", "4 drinks", "5 popular drinks", "2 popular drinks" and "this popular evening drink" without ever naming them. Here is the complete list of what we were pointing at, and what the research actually supports for each one. Where a study is cited, it is observational unless stated otherwise: it can show that two things travel together in a population, not that one causes the other.
This is the "popular evening drink" · Best-supported of the group
What the research says. A long-running study of British civil servants found that higher drinking, even at moderate levels, went with shrinkage of the hippocampus and faster decline in word fluency, and that light drinkers had no advantage over people who did not drink. [4] Alcohol also disturbs your nights and interacts with many everyday products.
Honest verdict. Of everything on this list, cutting back on alcohol has the strongest case behind it. It is still not "the cause" of memory slips, and no amount of cutting back is a promise.
About the product we sell. It contains no alcohol. It is a soft chew carrying three plant ingredients and two grams of added sugar, taken once a day.
Important. If you drink heavily every day, do not stop abruptly on your own. Ask your clinician how to cut back safely.
Part of the "3 popular drinks" and "4 drinks" · Partly supported
What the research says. Soft drinks sit on the ultra-processed shelf, and in a Brazilian study of 10,775 adults followed for about eight years, the people who ate and drank the most from that shelf slipped somewhat faster on thinking tests than those who ate the least. [5]
Honest verdict. A reasonable thing to cut down on, mostly for reasons that have nothing to do with a dramatic headline. Replacing them with water is a cheap, low-risk change.
One thing we should say about our own product here. It is sweet. The panel prints 20 calories, four grams of carbohydrate and two grams of added sugar per chew, from tapioca syrup and raw cane sugar. That is 60 grams of added sugar across one pouch and 364 grams across the twenty-six weeks of the only memory study behind it. It is a small fraction of a soft drink, and it is still added sugar, every morning. We print it because the seller prints it.
Often the "surprising" drink in our ads · No evidence we can stand behind
What the research says. We are not aware of a study that gives a clear answer about diet soft drinks and everyday memory, and we cite none here.
Honest verdict. Unresolved, and not a reason to panic. Anyone who tells you diet soda has been shown to harm your memory is going beyond the evidence.
Part of the "4 drinks" our ads name · Indirect concern
What the research says. There is little direct research linking energy drinks to memory. The concern for older adults is more immediate: high caffeine loads combined with sugar can bring a faster heartbeat, palpitations, jitters, an upset stomach and a poor night. [6]
Honest verdict. Worth avoiding if you are over 65 or sensitive to caffeine, for those reasons rather than any measured memory effect. The chew we sell prints "Decaffeinated" on its front panel.
The version of "coffee" our ads should have named · Partly supported
What the research says. These are sugary drinks that happen to contain coffee. Whatever applies to sugar-sweetened beverages applies to them. A large flavored frappé can carry as much added sugar as a soft drink.
Honest verdict. If our "coffee" headline had meant this, it would have been defensible. It did not, and we should have been specific.
Named in our headline as the worst offender · Our headline was wrong
What the research says. None of the studies on this page is about ordinary black coffee or plain tea, and tea is a routine part of the eating patterns studied for memory. Caffeine late in the day can cost you a night, so timing matters more than the drink itself. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams a day as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults, [6] and the European safety panel reached a similar place: single doses up to 200 milligrams and daily intakes up to 400 do not raise safety concerns in healthy adults. [9]
Honest verdict. "Coffee Tops The List" was a bad headline. It also sits awkwardly beside our own product, one of whose three ingredients is an extract of the fruit that grows around the coffee bean. The maker prints "Decaffeinated" on the front of the pouch, which is its own statement about that extract; the panel gives no milligram figure for caffeine, so nobody can give you a number from the label. If you test this chew, keep your coffee exactly where it was, or you will never know which of the two you are feeling.
The drink our headlines never name · The best supported thing on this page
What the research says. In 1,111 adults aged 60 to 89, the third who were measurably short of fluid slipped faster on a processing-speed test than the rest. [7] A review of 18 studies covering 33,707 adults over 60 found that being short of fluid in later life tracks with worse outcomes across the board and with poorer scores on tests of thinking. [8]
Honest verdict. It costs nothing, it cannot be sold in a pouch, and it is a better first move than anything on this site. We leave it out of our advertising for the obvious reason, and we are putting it back in here.
We do not print a list, and you should not act on one from an advertisement. Do not stop, reduce or skip anything a clinician gave you because of this page or any of our headlines.
The right action is simple: put everything you take, including what you buy over the counter, into one bag with this pouch and take it to your pharmacist. Ask: "Is anything here a poor choice at my age, and does anything here argue with a nitrate-rich beet powder or with a resveratrol?" Those are the two lines on this panel worth naming at the counter. Beet powder is sold for its dietary nitrate, which the body turns into a widener of blood vessels, and resveratrol can affect how some blood-thinning products work.
The food headlines referred to "3 foods" and to "cereals": one cereal in some versions, three in others. Again, the number was ours, not a finding. Here is what was meant, and what stands behind it.
The "3 cereals" / "1 cereal" that "age the brain faster than time" · Partly supported
What the research says. Frosted, honey-coated and chocolate cereals are mostly refined starch and added sugar, and many carry more sugar per serving than a cookie. They sit on the ultra-processed shelf that travels with faster slippage on thinking tests over years. [5] No study has found that any cereal "ages the brain faster than time." That phrase is ours and it is not defensible. In a community cohort of 1,391 adults, diets that carried more choline, which is eggs, milk, meat and beans, went with better scores on verbal and visual memory tests. [10]
Honest verdict. Reading the sugar figure on the box is a sensible habit, and the same habit applies to the pouch we sell, which prints two grams of added sugar a chew. Plain oats, plain shredded wheat and unsweetened whole-grain cereals are inexpensive swaps.
The honest version of all our food headlines · Partly supported
What the research says. A large Brazilian cohort found that adults with the highest intake of ultra-processed foods slipped faster on overall thinking and word-finding tests over roughly eight years than those who ate the least. [5] This is observational, the effect size was modest, and diet is tangled up with income, education and dozens of other factors.
Honest verdict. The pattern of your food over years matters more than any single item. That is a duller message than "these 3 foods", which is exactly why our headlines do not say it.
Usually two of the "3 foods" · Partly supported
What the research says. Both sit on the ultra-processed shelf in the study above. [5]
Honest verdict. Worth moderating. Not an emergency, and not undone by any supplement, including ours.
The fruit our package pictures · Partly supported, and not an ingredient here
What the research says. In a 12-week study of 26 healthy older adults averaging 68, a daily blueberry concentrate delivering 387 milligrams of anthocyanidins was associated with more blood reaching the brain on a scan and with a borderline improvement on a working-memory task. [11] That is a real result in roughly the right age group, and it used a concentrate made from a great many blueberries.
Honest verdict. The pouch we sell is flavored with blueberry and pomegranate. There is no blueberry line on its panel, no anthocyanidin figure anywhere on the package, and nothing about that trial transfers to a flavoring. If blueberries are what interested you, eat blueberries.
The refined-carbohydrate group · Partly supported
What the research says. The eating pattern most studied for memory is the MIND pattern: leafy greens, berries, beans, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish. In a three-year trial of 604 older adults, the group that ate that way and a group that simply ate a little less both improved their thinking scores, by about the same amount. [12]
Honest verdict. The useful advice was never "stop eating these 3 foods." It is "shift the overall pattern," which takes months and cannot be sold in a headline.
Drink more plain water. Drink less alcohol. Drink less sugar. Keep your coffee, earlier in the day if it costs you your nights. Eat more like the MIND or Mediterranean pattern (vegetables, whole grains, beans, nuts, olive oil, fish, berries) and less like a vending machine. Every one of those changes costs nothing extra, and none of them requires anything we sell.
Several of our headlines invite you to test yourself on words or phrases: spell these three words, pronounce these three phrases, see whether you say these seven phrases. There is no such validated test, and we cannot give you a real one, because a real one does not work that way.
What an actual memory check looks like. Clinicians use short structured checks. They do include word tasks: recalling three unrelated words after a delay, naming animals, repeating a sentence. But three things make them different from an online quiz:
These checks also produce false alarms. A bad night, trouble hearing, and simply being nervous all lower scores in people whose memory is fine. This is precisely why an online word quiz is meaningless: it has none of the context that makes the real check useful.
We are sorry. Take it as a prompt rather than a verdict: if the worry is real, bring it to your own clinician and ask for a proper memory check. If it was just a startling headline, the reassurance you are looking for cannot come from a quiz on an advertising page, including this one.
If we only had one section to be useful in, this would be it. None of these is a supplement, a chew, or a list of three foods, and none of them can be sold to you by us.
These are unglamorous. They cannot be delivered in a headline, they take years, and they are, by a wide margin, the most useful things on this entire page.
What each ingredient printed on the panel of HumanN (SuperBeets), sold by GNC Memory + Focus is, what it is traditionally used for, and what the cited research says, including who was in each study, at what amount, for how long, and what each study actually measured. One chew is a serving, and a pouch holds thirty. Four notes on the panel itself. The three named lines add up to 550 milligrams, and everything else in the chew, by weight, is the tapioca syrup, raw cane sugar, rice bran, flavorings, sunflower lecithin, sunflower oil, malic acid, glycerin, citric acid and stevia extract listed as other ingredients. Blueberry and pomegranate are the flavor and appear nowhere on the panel. The front of the pouch prints "Decaffeinated" for the coffee fruit extract, and the panel gives no caffeine figure. And no study has tested these three ingredients together in anyone.
The dried, ground root of the garden beet: the same deep-red vegetable that stains a cutting board, sold as a powder because it is rich in dietary nitrate, which the body turns into nitrite and nitric oxide, a natural widener of blood vessels.
Traditional and everyday use. Eaten as a vegetable across Europe and the Middle East for centuries; beet juice became a sports drink in the 2010s for its nitrate.
What the research says. In a small crossover study of older adults, a single day of a high-nitrate diet that included beet juice was associated with higher regional blood flow in the frontal white matter on MRI, with no change in overall brain blood flow.[2] That was a day of nitrate-rich food and juice, not 300 mg of powder, and it measured blood flow, not memory.
Amount per serving in SuperBeets Memory + Focus · Blueberry Pomegranate · 30 chews. 300 mg (a day of nitrate-rich food and beet juice moved regional blood flow in a small study; 300 mg of powder is a fraction of a glass of juice)
Good to know. Can color urine and stool pink or red, harmlessly. Beet powder is sold for its dietary nitrate, which the body turns into a widener of blood vessels: talk to your doctor before taking nitrate-rich products daily if you take anything daily.
A polyphenol made by grapes, berries and peanuts, concentrated in grape skins and in red wine, and sold as a supplement usually made from Japanese knotweed root or grape. Verti-te is a branded grape-derived form.
Traditional and everyday use. No use on its own; it arrived with the "French paradox" of the 1990s.
What the research says. In a 26-week placebo-controlled study of 46 healthy overweight adults aged 50 to 75, 200 mg a day of resveratrol was associated with better retention of words over 30 minutes and higher connectivity of the hippocampus on MRI.[3] One study, in overweight people, with one memory result; the chew holds 150 mg.
Amount per serving in SuperBeets Memory + Focus · Blueberry Pomegranate · 30 chews. 150 mg (three quarters of the 200 mg a day of the 26-week study in overweight adults aged 50 to 75)
Good to know. Generally well tolerated at these doses; higher doses can upset the stomach, and resveratrol can affect how some blood-thinning medicines work: ask a pharmacist if you take any.
The red fruit that surrounds the coffee bean, usually discarded after the beans are removed; dried and powdered it contains polyphenols and a small, variable amount of caffeine.
Traditional and everyday use. The fruit is drunk as 'cascara' tea in Yemen and Bolivia.
What the research says. In a single-dose study in healthy adults (10 per group), 100 mg of whole coffee fruit concentrate raised a blood marker (BDNF) by about 143 % over two hours; the authors asked for larger studies, and a blood marker is not a memory test.[1] Whatever alertness the powder gives comes from its caffeine, which EFSA says increases alertness in moderate doses.[9]
Amount per serving in SuperBeets Memory + Focus · Blueberry Pomegranate · 30 chews. 100 mg (the single dose that raised a blood marker over two hours in ten people)
Good to know. Contains caffeine in an amount the label does not state; one verified reviewer reports jitters. Count it with your coffee.
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. This information does not constitute medical advice and it should not be relied upon as such. This product is not a substitute for medication or other treatment prescribed by a physician or health care provider. Consult your doctor before starting any dietary supplement.
Set against the headlines that brought you here, this is the complete and honest position.
Things we cannot promise, and that nobody selling you a supplement can:
Things we can say honestly:
No. Those attributions are advertising language. No named or identifiable expert made those statements, and none has endorsed this product.
There is blueberry flavoring. Blueberry is not one of the three named lines on the panel.
None of the studies on this page is about plain coffee, and our "Coffee Tops The List" headline overstated it. What is worth watching is added sugar in coffee drinks, and caffeine late enough in the day to cost you a night. [6] [9]
The front of the pouch prints "Decaffeinated" for the coffee fruit extract. That is the maker's statement; the panel gives no milligram figure, so nobody can give you a number from the label.
No. Not on your own, and not because of an advertisement. Take everything you take to your pharmacist and ask whether anything is a poor fit for your age.
The grape-derived resveratrol. Its study ran 26 weeks in 46 healthy overweight adults aged 50 to 75 at 200 milligrams a day, and the panel prints 150. [3] It is also the only one of the three whose study measured memory at all.
Possibly two things. Beet powder is sold for its dietary nitrate, which the body turns into a widener of blood vessels, and resveratrol can affect how some blood-thinning products work. Take the pouch to your pharmacist before the first chew.
It can turn urine and stool pink or red for a day, harmlessly. It startles people who were not expecting it.
Two grams of added sugar and 20 calories a chew, from tapioca syrup and raw cane sugar, with a stevia extract alongside them.
A month tells you about the habit, the taste and how the beet sits with you. The only study behind the chew that measured memory ran twenty-six weeks, at a higher dose, in overweight adults. [3]
A full refund of the purchase price, minus shipping or other charges, within 30 days of the order date, with the pouch accepted used or unused, returned in good condition and in its original box where possible.
A fair question. Do not take our word for it. The references below are real, published sources you can look up yourself, and nothing in sections 4 and 5 requires you to buy anything or trust us. If this page and our headlines disagree, believe this page.
No. There is nothing to sign up for, and you are welcome to read it, close the tab and never come back.
Yes, and you should. Every numbered reference below can be found by searching its authors and journal. For general information, the National Institute on Aging (nia.nih.gov) publishes plain-language material and sells nothing.
These are the sources behind the claims marked with a number above. Several are observational studies, which can show association but not cause. The resveratrol study ran in overweight adults at a third more than this panel prints; the beet study was a single day of nitrate-rich eating with juice, measured on a scan; the coffee fruit study was a single dose in ten people per group measuring a protein in blood; the grape-extract trials tested a different preparation and carried authors connected to its maker; the blueberry trial used a concentrate, not a flavoring; the fact sheets are the governments' own. None of them tested this chew. We have deliberately not cited anything for the claims we describe as exaggerated, because there is nothing to cite.
Citing a study does not mean the study is about this product. The studies above tested one ingredient at a time, in other people, at amounts this chew matches only once, not the chew itself; none of the research tested HumanN (SuperBeets), sold by GNC Memory + Focus, and none of it supports it.
This site is an advertising publication. The Saturday Ledger is not a news organization, is not affiliated with any news outlet whose page our advertisements appear on, and is not affiliated with the National Institutes of Health, the Nobel Foundation, the Food and Drug Administration, or any medical body, university or government agency named on this page. Logos and names of publishers appear in our reporting dashboards only to describe where advertisements were placed; they imply no endorsement whatsoever.
The product on this site is made for Human Power of N (HumanN) of Austin, Texas and sold by GNC Holdings, LLC of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Headlines used in our advertising are promotional and may be dramatized, generalized or exaggerated for attention. Where a headline conflicts with this page, this page is correct. Individual results, testimonials and endorsements do not represent typical results. We are compensated when readers purchase products through our links.
Medical disclaimer. Nothing on this page is medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Do not delay seeking professional advice, and do not stop or change anything a clinician gave you, because of anything you read here. If you are worried about memory or concentration, your own or a family member's, speak to a qualified healthcare professional. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.